Powers and functions of the Committee
Procedure for dealing with complaints - general
Procedure for dealing with complaints by persons other than the BSB
Reference of complaints to other persons
Reference where barrister acting in judicial or quasi-judicial capacity
Committee's powers before investigation of complaints
Committee consideration of complaints
Appeals from written warnings and financial penalties
Commencement and Transitional Provisions
SCHEDULE 1: Determination by Consent
SCHEDULE 2: Inadequate professional service
1. These Rules prescribe the manner in which
(a) all complaints about the conduct of barristers and
(b) all complaints about the conduct of persons who, at the time
of such conduct, are serving a sentence of disbarment which is
subsequently overturned on appeal
shall be processed. In these Rules, the expression "barristers"
shall be interpreted as including persons falling within
sub-paragraph 1(b) above.
2. In these Rules unless the context otherwise requires
(a) Any term defined in the Code of Conduct shall carry the same
meaning as it does in Part X of the Code of Conduct.
(b) Reference to the "Professional Conduct Department" shall refer
to the Professional Conduct Department of the Bar Standards Board
("the BSB").
(c) Reference to "the regulatory objectives‟ shall refer to the
regulatory objectives as defined in section 1 of the Legal Services
Act 2007.
(d) Any reference to a person includes any natural person, legal
person and/or firm.
(e) Any reference to the masculine gender includes the feminine
and the neuter, and any reference to the singular includes the
plural, and in each case vice versa.
3. If a barrister is a member of more than one Inn, references in these Rules to his Inn shall mean the Inn by which he was called, unless he is a Bencher in which case his Inn shall mean the Inn of which he is a Bencher.
4. The Complaints Committee ("the Committee") and the Chairman
of the Committee shall each have the power to authorise any person,
group or body to fulfil any function or exercise any power given to
them by these Rules. Any authorisations under
ANNEXE J - The Complaints Rules / page J-3
ANNEXE J - Re-issued 1 January 2011
this paragraph must be in writing and may be both retrospective
and prospective, and both general and for a particular purpose.
5. Save in respect of the matters dealt with at paragraphs 24 and 25 below (time limits for making a complaint), the Committee, the Chairman of the Committee, or any person authorised under paragraph 4 above, shall have the power to extend any time limits prescribed by these Rules, in his or their absolute discretion, whenever it appears to be appropriate to do so.
Powers and functions of the Committee
6. The membership of the Committee shall be as prescribed by the Standing Orders of the BSB as amended from time to time.
7. The powers of the Committee shall be as set out in these
Rules, and shall include the power:
(a) to consider complaints made by persons other than the
BSB;
(b) to raise complaints on behalf of the BSB, and to withdraw such
complaints;
(c) to determine whether any complaint discloses a potential case
of professional misconduct or a potential breach of the Code, and
if so to deal with it in accordance with these Rules;
(d) to direct the investigation of complaints;
(e) to seek, in appropriate cases, to resolve complaints using the
Determination by Consent procedure;
(f) to bring charges of professional misconduct before
Disciplinary Tribunals (as provided by the Disciplinary Tribunals
Regulations at Annex K to the Code of Conduct) on behalf of the
BSB, to refer to such tribunals any legal aid complaint relating to
the conduct of a barrister and to be responsible for prosecuting
any such charges or legal aid complaints before such
Tribunals;
(g) to take such other actions in relation to complaints or
infringements of the Code of Conduct as are permitted by these
Rules, and in particular paragraph 31 below;
(h) to impose, or direct the imposition, of a fixed financial
penalty or a written warning under paragraph 901.1 of the Code of
Conduct, whether in connection with a complaint or otherwise;
(i) to make recommendations on matters of professional conduct to
the BSB or to any of its committees, as the Committee may think
appropriate;
(j) to make rulings on matters of professional conduct when the
Committee considers it appropriate to do so; and
(k) to exercise the power of the BSB under paragraph 108 of the
Code of Conduct to grant waivers of the provisions of that Code
either generally or in particular cases.
8. In the period up to 31 March 2011, the Complaints Committee shall have the additional powers and functions in relation to complaints of inadequate professional service as are set out in Schedule 2 to these Rules.
Procedure for dealing with complaints - general
9. The Committee may at any time postpone consideration of a complaint, whether to permit further investigation of the complaint to be made, or during the currency of related legal proceedings, or for any other reason it sees fit.
10. The Committee may at any time seek information or assistance, orally or in writing, as it thinks fit, from any person, group or body.
11. If at any time the Committee decides in accordance with
these Rules:
(a) to refer a complaint to another person or body for
consideration; or
(b) to dismiss or take no further action on a complaint; or
(c) to postpone consideration of a complaint or part of it;
it shall give written reasons for such decision, and provide such
reasons to the barrister against whom the complaint was made and
(where the complaint was made by a person other than the BSB) the
complainant.
12. Any complaint raised by the BSB itself shall be considered by the Committee in accordance with paragraph 28 and following below.
13. Any complaint other than a complaint raised by the BSB itself shall be considered by the Committee in accordance with paragraphs 14 to 27 below.
Procedure for dealing with
complaints by persons other than the BSB
Reference of complaints to other persons
14. If a complaint is made by or on behalf of a barrister‟s client
against that barrister, the Committee shall refer such complaint
without further consideration to the Legal Ombudsman, and shall
notify the complainant of the referral.
(a) For the avoidance of doubt, such referral shall not prevent
the immediate operation of the Interim Suspension Rules or the
Fitness to Practise Rules, where appropriate.
(b) On a complaint being referred, or referred back, to the BSB by
the Legal Ombudsman, paragraphs 15 and following below shall
apply.
15. If it appears to the Committee that a complaint against a
self-employed barrister (not being a complaint made by or on behalf
of a barrister‟s client against that barrister) may appropriately
be resolved by that barrister‟s Chambers, the Committee may refer
the complaint to the barrister‟s Chambers for investigation and
resolution.
16. When deciding whether to refer a complaint in accordance with
paragraph 15 above, the Committee shall take into account all the
circumstances, including:
(a) the seriousness of the complaint;
(b) the complexity of the complaint;
(c) the relationship (if any) between the complainant and the
barrister or the barrister‟s Chambers;
(d) any other factor relevant to the issue of whether it is
appropriate and potentially effective to refer the complaint to
Chambers.
17. Where a complaint relates to conduct which occurred more than twelve months prior to the complaint being made, the Committee shall consider whether the complaint should be dismissed in accordance with paragraph 25 below prior to deciding whether to refer the complaint to Chambers in accordance with paragraph 15 above.
18. Where a complaint is referred to Chambers, the Committee will send any information held by it relating to the complaint to the Head of Chambers, or the individual(s) responsible for administration of Chambers, who will be responsible for ensuring that the complaint is investigated in accordance with Annex S of the Code.
19. Following a referral to Chambers, the Committee shall inform the complainant of the complainant‟s rights under paragraph 21(b) below.
20. The Committee‟s decision under paragraph 15 is final and no party shall have the right to appeal against it.
21. If:
(a) the Committee considers that progress made by Chambers in
investigating and resolving the complaint, or the outcome of such
investigation, is unsatisfactory; or
(b) a complainant informs the Committee that he is dissatisfied
with the progress or outcome of the Chambers‟ investigation, giving
reasons for such dissatisfaction,
then the Committee shall consider the complaint in accordance with
paragraph 24 and following below.
22. If it appears to the Committee that a complaint relates to a
matter which might more appropriately be dealt with by the
barrister‟s Inn, Circuit, employer or some other regulatory body,it
may refer the complaint without further consideration to that other
body.
Reference where barrister acting in judicial or quasi-judicial capacity
23. (a) If it appears to the Committee that the complaint arises
out of a barrister's actions in a part-time or temporary judicial
or quasi-judicial capacity, it shall act as follows:
(i) If it appears to the Committee that the complaint would
otherwise fall to be dismissed under these Rules, the Committee
shall dismiss it.
(ii) If it appears to the Committee that the complaint would
otherwise not fall to be dismissed, the Committee shall refer the
complaint without further consideration to the person or body
responsible for the appointment of the barrister to the judicial or
quasi-judicial office concerned (whether the Lord Chancellor, a
Minister of the Crown or other person or body as appropriate) ("the
appointing body‟), requesting the appointing body to notify the
Committee when the complaint has been dealt with and of any action
taken. Where the appointing body is a person other than the Lord
Chancellor or a Minister of the Crown and where the Committee
considers it inappropriate to refer the complaint to the appointing
body, or where the appointing body refuses to deal with a
complaint, the Committee shall consider the complaint and, subject
to (iv) below, direct it to be proceeded with in accordance with
paragraph 28 and following below.
(iii) If the appointing body, having dealt with a complaint,
believes that it may be appropriate for further consideration by
the Bar Standards Board, the appointing body may, subject to (iv)
below, refer the matter to the Committee which may reconsider the
complaint and may, if it sees fit, direct it to be proceeded with
in accordance with paragraph 28 and following below.
(iv) No such reference to the Committee as is mentioned in (iii)
above by the appointing body
shall be acted upon by the Committee, nor shall the Committee
exercise the powers under the last sentence of paragraph (ii) above
in respect of any part of the complaint relating to anything said
or done by the barrister in the exercise of his judicial functions
or affecting the independence of the barrister in his judicial or
quasi-judicial capacity.
(b) If it appears to the Committee that the complaint relates to
the conduct of a barrister who, since the events giving rise to the
complaint took place, has been appointed to and continues to hold
full-time judicial office and has ceased practice, the Committee
shall not consider the complaint further and shall inform the
complainant that his complaint should be directed to the Lord
Chancellor or to such other person or body as may hereafter assume
the responsibilities of the Lord Chancellor in this regard.
Committee's powers before investigation of
complaints
24. In determining whether a complaint raised by a person other
than the BSB discloses a potential case of professional misconduct
or a potential breach of the Code, and whether, if it does, it is
apt for further consideration, the Committee shall first consider
whether the complaint has been made:
(a) within twelve months of the conduct of which complaint is
made, or
(b) (where a complainant has indicated to the Committee his
dissatisfaction with the outcome of a Chambers‟ investigation in
accordance with paragraph above) within three months of the
conclusion of the investigation by Chambers,
whichever is the later. Where the conduct of which complaint is
made is (or was) ongoing or consists of a series of related acts or
omissions, then the conduct shall for the purposes of this
paragraph be treated as having taken place at the time when the
ongoing conduct ceased or at the time of the last of such acts or
omissions.
25. Where the Committee considers that the complaint has not
been made within the period identified in paragraph 24 above, then
it shall dismiss the complaint unless it considers that further
consideration of the complaint is justified, despite the lapse
of
time, by reason of the regulatory objectives. The Committee shall
give written reasons for any decision made under this
paragraph.
26. The Committee shall next consider whether further
consideration of the complaint is justified. If the Committee
considers that:
(a) the complaint for any reason obviously lacks substance;
(b) the complaint cannot be properly or fairly investigated, or
the barrister is for any reason unable fairly to respond to
it;
(c) the complaint or its consequences are insufficiently serious
to justify further action; or
(d) for any other reason whatsoever the complaint is not apt for
further consideration;
then the Committee shall dismiss the complaint.
27. If a complaint is not dismissed by the Committee following its initial consideration, it shall be investigated and dealt with in the manner set out in paragraph 28 and following below.
28. The investigation of complaints shall be conducted by the Professional Conduct Department under the direction of the Committee.
29. Following the completion of any investigation into a complaint, the Committee shall exercise the powers given to it by paragraph 30 and following below.
Committee consideration of
complaints
30. The Committee shall consider complaints, together with the results of investigations thereof, in such manner as it shall see fit, provided that (save in the case of complaints falling within paragraph 31(b) below), the Committee shall not conclude that there is a realistic prospect of a finding of professional misconduct being made against a barrister on the basis of any allegation by a complainant to which the barrister has not had a reasonable opportunity to respond.
31. If in the course of its consideration of a complaint ("the
original complaint") the Committee considers that there is any
matter other than that complained of which might give rise to a
potential case of professional misconduct, the Committee may raise
a complaint about that matter on behalf of the BSB ("the new
complaint").
(a) In such event, unless the new matter falls within
sub-paragraph (b) below:
(i) The new complaint shall be investigated in the manner set out
in paragraph 28 and following above.
(ii) The Committee shall not proceed to consider whether there is
a realistic prospect of a finding of professional misconduct being
made in respect of the new complaint unless and until the barrister
concerned has been given the opportunity to comment in writing on
the matter complained of in the new complaint. The Committee shall
take any comments made by the barrister into consideration when it
determines whether there is a realistic prospect of a finding of
professional misconduct being made in respect of the new
complaint.
(iii) The Committee may defer further consideration of the
original complaint pending the results of any investigation of the
new complaint.
(b) No further investigation will be required where:
(i) the subject matter of the new complaint has already been
investigated in the course of investigations into the original
complaint, or
(ii) the new complaint is a complaint made by the BSB of a breach
of paragraphs 901.2, 901.4, 901.5, 901.6 or 905(b)(c) or (f) of the
Code of Conduct.
32. Upon considering any complaint, and subject to the
provisions of paragraph 38 below, the Committee may take any of the
following steps:
(a) Dismiss the complaint, provided that (where the decision is
taken at a meeting of the Committee, and not by some other person,
group or body authorised in accordance with paragraph 4 of these
Rules) the majority of the lay members present at the meeting
consent to such dismissal.
(b) Determine that no further action shall be taken on the
complaint.
(c) Direct that the complaint should be subject to the
Determination by Consent procedure (under paragraphs 43 and 44 of
these Rules) or form the subject matter of a charge before a
Disciplinary Tribunal.
33. A direction shall be made by the Committee under paragraph
32(c) above only where:
(a) the Committee considers that there is a realistic prospect of
a finding of professional misconduct being made; and
(b) the Committee decides that the regulatory objectives would be
best served by pursuing disciplinary proceedings.
34. For the purpose of these Rules a "realistic prospect of a finding of professional misconduct being made‟ means that the Committee considers, on the information then available to it and having regard to the evidence which it regards as likely to be available at any tribunal or final determination of a complaint, that it is more likely than not that such a finding will be made.
35. Where the Committee decides to take no further action on a
complaint, or dismisses a complaint, but the barrister‟s conduct is
nevertheless such as to give cause for concern, the Committee may
in those circumstances, and either before or after any disposal of
the complaint, do any or all of the following:
(a) draw to the barrister‟s attention in writing the Committee‟s
concerns;
(b) direct the barrister to apologise in writing to the
complainant;
(c) advise him as to his future conduct either in writing or by
directing him to attend on the Chairman of the Committee or on some
other person nominated by the Committee, to receive such
advice;
(d) in a case where there has been an infringement of the
provisions of paragraph 901.1 of the Code, direct the Professional
Conduct Department to administer a formal written warning and/or a
financial penalty for the infringement.
If the complaint of professional misconduct was not dismissed
before any such direction or advice was made or given, the
Committee may thereafter dismiss that complaint.
36. If, when dismissing or deciding to take no further action on a complaint, the Committee nonetheless considers that the circumstances of the complaint are relevant to the barrister‟s position as a pupil supervisor, it may notify the barrister‟s Inn of its concern in such manner as it sees fit.
37. Where a barrister is directed to apologise to the complainant pursuant to paragraph 35(b) above, the Committee may direct that such apology is to be approved by the Chairman of the Committee, or a person nominated by the Chairman of the Committee, prior to being sent to the complainant.
38. If the subject matter of the complaint involves a conviction for an offence of dishonesty or deception the Committee shall direct that the complaint should form the subject matter of a charge before a Disciplinary Tribunal.
39. In all other cases where the Committee considers that there
is a realistic prospect of a finding of professional misconduct
being made, in determining what is the appropriate means of
disposal under paragraph 32 above, the Committee shall be entitled
to take into consideration any matters which it considers relevant,
including but not limited to:
(a) the barrister‟s previous conduct (including any disciplinary
findings made against him as a student by his Inn, or any
disciplinary findings made against him by any other professional or
regulatory body);
(b) the means by which any previous complaints against him have
been disposed of; and
(c) the means by which complaints of a similar nature against
other barristers have been disposed of.
40. If the Committee considers that there is a realistic
prospect of a finding of professional misconduct being made against
a registered European lawyer in respect of the complaint, the
Professional Conduct Department shall:
(a) inform the professional body of which the registered European
lawyer is a Member in his home Member State;
(b) offer that professional body the opportunity to make
representations to the Disciplinary Tribunal to which the complaint
has been referred or (where the Determination by Consent procedure
is used) to the Committee; and
(c) inform that professional body of findings made by any panel
under these Rules or under Annexes K, M or N of this code.
41. The Committee may reopen or reconsider a complaint which has
been disposed of, unless it has been disposed of by a Disciplinary
Tribunal,
(a) where new evidence becomes available to the Committee which
leads it to conclude that it should do so, or
(b) for some other good reason.
42. Following such reopening or reconsideration, the Committee
may take any further or different action it thinks fit, as if the
former decision had not been made, provided that if the complaint
has already been referred to a Disciplinary Tribunal and charges
have been served on the Defendant then the Committee's actions
shall be confined to instructing counsel for the BSB to:
(a) offer no evidence on a charge, or
(b) apply to the Directions Judge for the making of additions to
or amendments of a charge.
43. A complaint may, with the consent of the barrister against whom the complaint is made, be finally determined by the Committee. This is referred to as the "Determination by Consent procedure".
44. The circumstances in which the Determination by Consent procedure is to be used, and how it is to be used, are set out in Schedule 1 to these Complaints Rules.
45. If the Committee directs under paragraphs 33 or 38 above that a complaint shall form the subject matter of a charge before a Disciplinary Tribunal, the following paragraphs shall have effect.
46. At the same time as the Committee directs that a complaint
shall form the subject matter of a charge before a Disciplinary
Tribunal, the Committee shall also direct whether a three-person
panel or a five-person panel is to be constituted.
(a) Where paragraph 38 above applies (complaint involving
conviction for dishonesty or deception), the Committee shall direct
that a five-person panel is to be constituted.
(b) In all other cases, in deciding whether to direct the
constitution of a three-person or a five-person panel, the
Committee shall only consider the sentence which it considers is
likely to be imposed if the barrister is found guilty of the
charges alleged, having regard to
(i) any applicable Sentencing Guidance issued by the Council of
the Inns of Court; and
(ii) the previous disciplinary record of the barrister; and
(iii) any deferred sentence which would be activated if the
barrister were to be found guilty of the charges alleged.
(c) If the Committee considers that the barrister is likely, if
convicted, to be disbarred or suspended from practice for more than
three months then the Committee shall direct that a five-person
panel is to be constituted;
otherwise, the Committee shall direct that a three-person panel is
to be constituted.
(d) The Committee shall inform the barrister and the complainant
(if any) of the decision taken under this paragraph. The decision
taken by the Committee under this paragraph shall not be subject to
any appeal.
47. Where the Committee directs that a three-person panel is to be constituted, the Committee may, if it thinks fit, recommend that a Judge rather than a QC be appointed to act as Chairman of the Panel, giving reasons for any such recommendation.
48. In the event that another charge of professional misconduct is pending or to be brought against the barrister concerned, the Committee shall have the power to direct that the additional charge be brought before the same Tribunal or panel as is disposing of the original charge, even if the additional charge, by itself, may be regarded as insufficiently serious to merit disposal by a Tribunal of that level.
49. The Committee may direct that the prosecution of the charges
be expedited if it considers that one or more of the following
conditions are satisfied:
(a) the facts of the complaint are unlikely to be disputed (for
example because it involves a criminal conviction),
(b) witnesses are unlikely to be called for the hearing,
(c) the case needs to be resolved urgently, or
(d) there is some other good reason for expedition.
50. When the Committee has directed that a complaint shall form
the subject matter of a charge before a Disciplinary Tribunal, the
Committee shall be responsible for bringing the charge on behalf of
the BSB. In this regard:
(a) The Committee may arrange for the appointment of counsel to
settle the charge and to present the case before the Tribunal, and
may arrange for the appointment of a solicitor or such other person
as may be necessary to assist counsel and prepare the case.
(b) Any charges shall be brought in the name and on behalf of the
BSB.
51.
(a) The BSB shall respect the confidentiality of complaints. The
BSB shall not disclose the fact that a complaint has been made or
details of the complaint or its disposal save as specified in this
paragraph or otherwise required by law.
(b) Disclosure may be made:
(i) for the purpose of investigating the complaint;
(ii) for the purpose of keeping the complainant and the barrister
informed of the progress of the complaint;
(iii) for the purpose of publicising any forthcoming public
hearing of charges arising from the complaint;
(iv) where the complainant and the barrister consent;
(v) for the purposes of paragraph 40 of these Rules;
(vi) where the publication of a finding is required by the
provisions of the Disciplinary Tribunals Regulations 2009;
(vii) subject to paragraph (c) below, in response to a request
from the selection panel or a member of its secretariat in respect
of an application by a barrister for silk; or from any body
responsible for the appointment of judges in respect of an
application for judicial appointment; or from some other body for a
Certificate of Good Standing in respect of a barrister; or from one
of the Inns of Court in respect of an application from a barrister
to become a pupil supervisor; or
(viii) with the approval of the Committee, for any other good
reason.
(c) Where a disclosure is made pursuant to paragraph (b)(vii)
above:
(i) If any complaint has been made against the barrister concerned
which has not been disposed of by the Committee under paragraph
32(a), (d) or (e) of these Rules, or dismissed by any Disciplinary
Tribunal or by any other body to which it may have referred by the
Committee, the BSB shall simply indicate that a complaint has been
received which has not been dismissed; and
(ii) if a finding of professional misconduct has been recorded
against the barrister concerned, the BSB shall disclose the finding
and the penalty;
(iii) if the request is from the selection panel or a member of
its secretariat in respect of an application by a barrister for
silk or if the request is from one of the Inns of Court in respect
of an application by a barrister to become a pupil supervisor if a
finding of inadequate professional service has been recorded
against the barrister concerned, the BSB shall disclose the finding
and penalty.
(d) Where any finding of professional misconduct has been made
(whether by a Disciplinary Tribunal, the Visitors, or the Committee
in the course of a Determination by Consent), the BSB shall publish
on the BSB‟s website the name of the barrister against whom that
finding was made, the nature of that finding, and the sentence
imposed, unless the body making the finding directs otherwise.
Appeals from written warnings and financial penalties
52. A barrister‟s appeal in accordance with paragraph 901.3 of the Code from a written warning or financial penalty imposed by the BSB for any failure to comply with the provisions identified in paragraph 901.1 of the Code shall lie to an Appeal Panel constituted under the auspices of the Council of the Inns of Court in the same manner as a three-person panel constituted under Regulation 2(3) of the Disciplinary Tribunal Regulations.
53. An appeal shall be made by the barrister sending to the Chairman of the Committee, within the time provided by paragraph 901.3 of the Code, a notice identifying the warning or financial penalty appealed against, the decision the barrister contends for, the grounds of such appeal and a statement of whether or not the barrister requires his appeal to be disposed of at an oral hearing. The appeal shall be by way of a re-hearing.
54. The notice shall be accompanied by the sum of £100 (or such other sum as may be prescribed by the BSB from time to time) payable to the BSB to defray expenses.
55. At least 5 working days before the time set for the appeal, the Professional Conduct Department will provide each member of the Panel and the barrister with a paginated bundle of the correspondence and other documents on its files relating to the imposition of the written warning and financial penalty.
56. On such an appeal:
(a) the barrister may be represented;
(b) the Appeal Panel shall decide whether to set aside the written
warning or financial penalty or both, or to replace a written
warning with a financial penalty or vice versa, as
appropriate;
(c) if the Appeal Panel shall allow the appeal in whole or in
part, the Panel may direct that the sum paid under paragraph 54
above shall be refunded: but the Appeal Panel shall have no power
to award costs.
Commencement and Transitional Provisions
57.
(a) These Rules will come into effect on 1st January 2011. They
shall apply to all complaints whenever raised.
(b) Any step taken in relation to any complaint prior to 1st
January 2011 pursuant to the provisions of the Rules then applying
shall be regarded, unless otherwise decided, as having been taken
pursuant to the equivalent provisions of these Rules.
SCHEDULE 1: Determination by
Consent
1. The Committee shall, in deciding whether to make a complaint
subject to the Determination by Consent procedure under paragraph
43 of the Complaints Rules, consider all the circumstances. The
Committee may make the complaint subject to the Determination by
Consent procedure only if it considers that:
(a) there is a realistic prospect of a finding of professional
misconduct being made in respect of the complaint; and
(b) there are no substantial disputes of fact which can only
fairly be resolved by oral evidence being taken; and
(c) the breach or breaches of the Code, if proved, combined
with
(i) the barrister‟s previous disciplinary history, and
(ii) any deferred sentences which would be activated if the breach
or breaches were proved,
do not appear to be such as to warrant a period of suspension from
practice or disbarment; and
(d) there are no exceptional circumstances which would warrant no
further action being taken on the complaint or the complaint being
dismissed; and
(e) there are no other public interest considerations which
warrant a full hearing.
2. A decision taken under paragraph 43 of the Complaints Rules shall be final and neither the barrister nor the complainant (if applicable) may appeal against such a decision.
3. The Determination by Consent procedure shall be conducted in accordance with such procedures as the Committee may prescribe from time to time.
4. The Committee may terminate the Determination by Consent
procedure at any time if it no longer considers that the
requirements of paragraph 1 of this Schedule are satisfied, or for
any other good reason.
5. If the Determination by Consent procedure terminates other than by a finding and sentence to which the barrister consents, then the complaint shall be disposed of by the Committee in accordance with paragraph 30 and following of the Complaints Rules.
6. The Committee shall publish any finding and sentence resulting from the Determination by Consent procedure to the same extent as such publication would have taken place following a finding and sentence resulting from a Disciplinary Tribunal, as provided for in paragraph 29 of Annex K to the Code of Conduct.
7. Once accepted by the barrister, no appeal may be made against a determination by consent, whether by the barrister or by the complainant (if applicable).
8. In determining any sanction to be imposed under the Determination by Consent procedure, the Committee shall have regard to any applicable Sentencing Guidance published by the Council of the Inns of Court.
9. A barrister against whom a charge of professional misconduct
has been found proved under the Determination by Consent procedure
may be subject to the following sanctions:
(a) ordered to pay a fine of up to £15,000 to the Bar Standards
Board (save that no fine may be ordered in excess of £5,000 unless
the relevant conduct occurred after 31st March 2009);
(b) ordered to complete continuing professional development of
such nature and duration as the Committee shall direct and to
provide satisfactory proof of compliance with this order to the
Committee;
(c) reprimanded by the Treasurer of his Inn;
(d) reprimanded by the Committee;
(e) given advice by the Committee as to his future conduct;
(f) ordered to attend on a nominated person to be
reprimanded;
(g) ordered to attend on a nominated person to be given advice as
to his future conduct;
(h) ordered to provide the complainant with an apology (save that
such order may be made only in respect of conduct which took place
after 1st July 2008);
(i) ordered to take and pass a test in professional conduct and
ethics by a stated date, failing which the barrister shall be
suspended from practice until such test has been passed, provided
that no such sentence shall be imposed unless and until the Bar
Standards Board has prescribed procedures by which such tests are
to be conducted.
10. Where a barrister is directed to apologise to the complainant pursuant to paragraph 9(h) above, the Committee may direct that such apology is to be approved by the Chairman of the Committee, or a person nominated by the Chairman of the Committee, prior to being sent to the complainant.
11. Where the Committee has imposed a fine, the confirmation letter to the barrister shall indicate that the barrister must pay the fine within 28 days, subject to any representations made regarding the need for extra time to pay. Any application to pay a fine in instalments shall be left to the discretion of the Chairman of the Committee.
12. Where a sanction imposed by the Committee includes a fine,
that element of the sentence may be directed by the Committee to
have deferred effect. A sentence may have deferred effect for a
minimum of six months or a maximum of two years (the "period of
deferral").
(a) A deferred sentence shall be activated where the barrister is
subsequently found (whether during the period of deferral or
afterwards) to have committed a Relevant Breach during the period
of deferral. For the purpose of this Regulation, a Relevant Breach
would be a breach of the Code of Conduct amounting to professional
misconduct.
(b) Where the Committee finds that there has been a Relevant
Breach during the period of deferral, it shall (at the same time as
imposing sentence for the Relevant Breach) activate the sentence
which had been deferred, save in exceptional circumstances.
(c) For the avoidance of doubt, the Committee may (where the
conditions for activation of a deferred sentence are satisfied)
activate a deferred sentence imposed by a Disciplinary Tribunal, so
long as the total sanction imposed does not exceed the powers of
the Committee set out in paragraph 9 above.
13. For the avoidance of doubt, any sanction imposed by the Committee under the Determination by Consent procedure shall be treated as a sentence imposed by a tribunal for the purpose of paragraph 905(f) of the Code of Conduct.
SCHEDULE 2: Inadequate professional service
1. Subject to the paragraphs below, in the period up to 31 March
2011, in respect of any complaint made by or on behalf a
barrister‟s lay client before 6 October 2010:
(1) The Committee shall have the same powers in relation to
complaints of inadequate professional service as it has in relation
to complaints of professional misconduct or other failures to
comply with the Code.
(2) References to "professional misconduct‟ in paragraphs 24, 30,
34, 35, 39, and 40 these Rules shall be read as if they referred to
"professional misconduct or inadequate professional service‟.
(3) Paragraph 14 of these Rules shall not apply.
2. Paragraph 33 of these Rules shall read as follows
"(i) If the Committe considers that there is a realistic prospect
of a finding of inadequate professional service being made but (if
the complaint also involves professional misconduct) there is no
realistic prospect of a finding of professional misconduct being
made or the matter is n the opinion of the Committee not serious
enough to warrant reference to a Disciplinary Tribunal, the
Committee may direct that the complaint be referred to an
Adjudication Panel to be dealt with as a case of inadequate
professional services alone in accordance with the Adjudication
Panel Rules (Annex P to the Code of Conduct).
(ii) If the Committee considers that there is a realistic prospect
of a finding of professional misconduct being made (whether with or
without inadequate professional service) in circumstances where the
Committee decides that the regulatory objectives would be best
served by pursuing disciplinary proceedings and thus the matter
should not be disposed of under sub-paragraphs 32(a) or 32(b)
above, direct that the complaint should be subject to the
Determination by Consent procedure (under paragraphs 43 and 44 of
these Rules) or form the subject matter of a charge before a
Disciplinary Tribunal."
3. From 31 March 2011, the Bar Council shall cease to have
jurisdiction in respect of any aspects of any complaints involving
inadequate professional service. Accordingly, on that date:
(1) The Committee shall cease any investigation or consideration
of any aspect of any complaint involving allegations of inadequate
professional service.
(2) The Committee shall discontinue any proceedings before any
panel or tribunal in respect of any aspect of any complaint
involving allegations of inadequate professional service.
(3) The Committee shall transfer to the Legal Services Ombudsman
any files relating to any complaints involving inadequate
professional service which have not been disposed of.
(4) The Committee shall thereafter not reopen or reconsider any
aspect of any complaint involving allegations of inadequate
professional service.
4. Nothing in this Schedule shall affect the continued acceptance, consideration and pursuit of complaints alleging professional misconduct, even where the behaviour complained of might also constitute inadequate professional service.